Tuesday, February 24, 2009

2008 Elections-Candidates or Parties?


The candidates in the 2008 presidential elections did not seem like agents of their parties. It proved difficult for the Republicans to even nominate a candidate. Every major possibility (McCain, Huckabee, and Romney) each had their own group within the party that disapproved of their candidacy. So no matter who was nominated, there would be some group not satisfied. My point here is that it seems difficult for a candidate to be an agent of the party when the entire party doesn’t even support his/her candidacy. And on the Democratic side, I turn to the issue of fundraising, especially in Obama’s case. He was very successful at raising money, in large part because of smaller donations from many individuals. Here it seems he did a lot of his own work, not the party.


Advances in technology and communication have only shifted the balance between candidate and party-centered campaigns. In this past election, things seemed to be quite candidate-centered. Thanks to the internet, each candidate has the ability to create a website where voters can visit and learn more about the campaign. These websites are candidate-centered with only some reference to the parties. (For example, on Obama’s home page, there is a link to the DNC web page, but otherwise, little mentioning of the party is done on the main page.) Everything on the website has his name all over it, Obama this and Obama that… the “Obama Store” etc.

The Obama website seems to be following the advice of the Teachout article. She mentions how a website, all in one central place, can list contact information and give directions for citizens to local events. On Obama’s home page, there is a map of the United States in the top right corner with the heading, “Get Involved Now, Find an Event Near You.” This is clearly what Teachout is talking about in her article. Getting people out to local events is a key part of a candidate’s web-site. Teachout also mentions blogs and how Howard Dean used his “Blog for America” as a tool for reaching his supporters. This blog contained everything from news stories to struggles in campaigning for the presidency. Obama also keeps a blog on his website to inform his supporters of recent developments in the Obama administration. (I’m certain while campaigning though it was all about the campaign rather than the administration.)

5 comments:

  1. I completely agree with your post. The Obama site did agree with what Teachout said. Do you think Obama's campaign was candidate or party-centered?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think his was more candidate centered, especially during the primaries when he and Hilary were competing for the democratic nomination.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What would a party-centered primary contest between two well matched competitors look like?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Was selecting Sarah Palin strictly about winning more elements of the Republican Party? Was McCain hurt by catering to his party?

    ReplyDelete
  5. In response to the first question... If two competitors were closely matched for the nomination in a party-centered campaign, I think they would go back and forth about how the other is not representative of the party. And then go on and on about how they themselves are the best choice for the party.

    And the second... McCain's choice of Sarah Palin for the VP nomination I think was an effort to unite the party behind him. I think most Republicans think she did a good job of uniting the party. Although, she appeared to most others as highly "unfit" for the white house. I think McCain eventually was hurt by the decision to run with Sarah Palin.

    ReplyDelete